Is Article Marketing More Effective Than Pay-Per-Click?
Powered by Max Banner Ads
Being a writer, I have always thought that article marketing is the more valuable search engine optimization(SEO) tool over pay-per-click because article marketing offers a more permanent and long term effect. Both are operating in completely different ways, with PPC promoting the business by means of getting the search engines to show specific keywords and paying when the ads are clicked and article marketing utilizing the effectivenes of writing short articles to promote the website, there's no escaping the fact that these online marketing strategies can be very effective in gettting remarkable outcomes in terms of getting the website out there within the prospective customer's clicking distance .
I’m relieved that I came across Valerie Mellena’s piece called “The Last Word in PPC vs. Article Marketing.” The article thoroughly analyzes these two marketing techniques with statistics strengthening her conclusions. “In figuring out which of the two is better, you have to consider cost-effectiveness as well as click-through-rates and direct conversion from visiting user to paying customer,” she wrote.
“Search engine result pages display more listings than PPC results, which does have a psychological effect on the user,” wrote Mellena. “For some users seeing ten search results is enough to convince them that there is enough web information on the subject and that “fishing” PPC ads might not be necessary". I absolutely agree on what she state here. I, for one, would always scan the search results list first and foremost before I even look at the PPC ads.
With article marketing, she said that, “In order to actually rank in the Top 10 SEO results for your keyword, you have to have relevant website content, not to mention technical prowess in HTML coding". Search engines then determine which website is more relevant, unlike in PPC where, in her words, “whoever bids the highest for each word usually gets the top listing. In the end money talks.”
She then asks if you are ”appealing to the fast clicker or the thoughtful user.”
Mellena cited information with sources from ComScore, Webxico, iProspect, SEOResearcher and Hotchkiss, Garrison, and Jensen, which observed, that “77% of search users choose organic (article) listings over PPC ads". A few other studies pointed out that organic click-through resulted in 25% higher conversion rates than the counterpart Pay-Per-Click (PPC) click-through. After knowing all these, it got me persuaded that article marketing is the better choice when it comes to advertising products, but Mellena wrote some advantages about PPC advertising that made me feel otherwise. “The best feature PPC has is that it gets instantaneous results. SEO advertising takes time,” she wrote. “PPC brings you immediate traffic and sometimes brings in thousands of users.”
She also noted that Comscore published statistics in favor of PPC, disclosing that their studied users had an 18.3% click-through-rate on “paid” search results as opposed to 4.3% click-through rate for organic search results.
However, she proceeded to state that a considerable downside for PPC promotion is that it makes the most of the prospective clients’ idiosyncrasies. “When that curiosity fades, they forget your website - especially if it’s just a glorified advertisement.” She also added that, “Most users know that PPC ads usually aren’t relevant to their search - they’re just there because someone is constantly paying big bucks to get noticed.”
She then continued on to praise article marketing as “an investment that continually pays all through the life of your company (or until you shut the website down) since it generates traffic forever.” An online marketing plan like that is practically supreme. Can you imagine an endless traffic coming in perpetually? Now that's an remarkable marketing plan.
As to ROI, a research conducted by distinguished blogger Gord Hotchkiss revealed that article marketing is more constant (although slower) than PPC as far as to Return-On-Investment. Mellena expounded on this issue by showing a series of calculations of sorts, for example: “Let's say you have 50 high traffic search terms. Now for these 50 terms, there are 2.8 million searches being launched in a month,” she wrote. “If statistics like ComScore's are correct and unbiased, that translates to 456,000 visitors thanks to PPC and 153,000 visitors thanks to article marketing.”
“The total cost of those 456,000 PPC visitors would amount to over $500,000 with an average CPC of $1.18. Even if you work with an SEO company that charges top dollar ($10,000 a month, let's say) you're still paying $10,000 compared to half a million. That means article marketing's virtual CPC amounts to $0.07. Even if you apply PPC's higher conversion rate, 3,647 converted visitors, you are paying $147.08 for each individual person. Compare that to 611 visitors you earned through article marketing - you are paying $16.37 for each visitor. And in doing so, you are also earning a higher quality of customer and generating traffic until the end of days.”
It is quite clear that in the end, the author chose article marketing as the better method. “When it comes to earning quality traffic, article marketing gets the last word.” I’m inclined to have the same view as hers. How about you?